"Rejected silver" (Jeremiah 6:30)
"Nothing but leaves" (Mark 11:13)
"Let us not love with words or tongue but with actions and in truth"
(1 John 3:18).
"You have a reputation of being alive, but you are dead" (Revelation 3:1)
If we profess to have any religion at all, let us be careful that it is
authentic. I say it emphatically, and I repeat the saying: Let us be
careful that our religion is authentic.
What do I mean when I use the word "authentic." I mean that which is
genuine, and sincere, and honest, and thorough. I mean that which is not
inferior, and hollow, and formal, and false, and counterfeit, and sham,
and nominal. "Authentic" religion is not mere show, and pretense, and
skin-deep feeling, and temporary profession, and works only on the
outside. It is something inward, solid, substantial, intrinsic, living,
lasting. We know the difference between counterfeit and authentic
money--between solid gold and tinsel--between plated metal and
silver--between authentic stone and plaster imitation. Let us think of
these things as we consider the subject of this paper. What is the
character of our religion? Is it authentic? It may be weak, and feeble,
and mingled with many defects. That is not the point before us today.
Is our religion authentic? Is it true?
The times in which we live demand attention to this subject. A want of
authenticity is a striking feature of a vast amount of religion in the
present day. Poets have sometimes told us that the world has passed
through four different states or conditions. We have had a golden age,
and a silver age, a brass age, and an iron age. How far this is true, I
do not stop to inquire. But I fear there is little doubt as to the
character of the age in which we live. It is universally an age of cheap
metal and alloy. If we measure the religion of the age by its apparent
quantity, there is much of it. But if we measure it by its quality,
there is indeed very little. On every side we want MORE AUTHENTICITY.
I ask your attention, while I try to bring home to men's consciences the
question of this paper. There are two things which I propose to do:
I. In the first place, I will show the "importance of authenticity in
religion."
II. In the second place, I will supply "some tests by which we may prove
whether our own religion is authentic."
Does any reader of this paper have any desire to go to heaven when he
dies? Do you wish to have a religion which will comfort you in life,
give you good hope in death, and survive the judgment of God at the last
day? Then, do not turn away from the subject before you. Sit down, and
consider calmly, whether your Christianity is authentic and true, or
counterfeit and hollow.
I. I have to show "the importance of authenticity in religion."
The point is one which, at first sight, may seem to require very few
remarks to establish it. All men, I am told, are fully convinced of the
importance of authenticity. But is this true? Can it indeed be said
that authenticity is rightly judged among Christians? I deny it
entirely. The greater part of people who profess to admire authenticity,
seem to think that everyone possesses it! "They tell us that all have
got good hearts," and that all are sincere and true for the most part,
though they may make mistakes. They call us unchristian, and harsh, and
censorious, if we doubt anybody's goodness of heart. In short, they
destroy the value of authenticity by regarding it as a thing, which
almost every one has.
This widespread delusion is precisely one of the causes why I take up
this subject. I want men to understand that "authenticity" is a far more
rare and uncommon thing than is commonly supposed. I want men to see
that "unreality" is one of the great dangers of which Christians ought to
beware.
What does the Scripture say? This is the only judge that can try the
subject. Let us turn to our Bibles, and examine them fairly, and then
deny, if we can, the importance of authenticity in religion, and the
danger of not being authentic.
(1) Let us look then, for one thing, at the parables spoken by our Lord
Jesus Christ. Observe how many of them are intended to put in strong
contrast the true believer and the mere nominal disciple (in name only).
The parables of the sower, of the weeds, of the net, of the two sons, of
the wedding garment, of the ten virgins, of the talents, of the great
banquet, of the ten minas, of the two builders, all have one great point
in common. They all bring out in striking colors the difference between
authenticity and unreality in religion. They all show the uselessness
and danger of any Christianity which is not authentic, thorough, and
true.
(2) Let us look, for another thing, at the language of our Lord Jesus
Christ about the scribes and the Pharisees. Eight times in one chapter
we find Him denouncing them as "hypocrites," in words of almost fearful
severity--"You snakes! You brood of vipers! How will you escape being
condemned to hell?" (Matthew 23:33). What can we learn from these
tremendously strong expressions? How is it that our gracious and
merciful Savior used such cutting words about people who at any rate were
more moral and decent than the tax collectors and prostitutes? It is
meant to teach us the exceeding detestableness of false profession and
mere outward religion in God's sight. Open wickedness and willful
submission to fleshly lusts are no doubt ruinous sins, if not given up.
But there seems nothing which is so displeasing to Christ as hypocrisy
and unreality.
(3) Let us also look at the startling fact, that there is hardly a grace
in the character of a true Christian of which you will not find a
counterfeit described in the Word of God. There is not a feature in a
believer's countenance of which there is not an imitation. Give me your
attention, and I will show you this in a few examples.
Is there not a false "repentance?" Without a doubt there is. Saul and
Ahab, and Herod, and Judas Iscariot had many feelings of sorrow about
sin. But they never really repented unto salvation.
Is there not a false "faith?" Without a doubt there is. It is written
of Simon Magus, at Samaria, that he "believed," and yet his heart was not
right in the sight of God. It is even written of the devils that they
"believe and shudder" (Acts 8:13; James 2:19).
Is there not a false "holiness." Without a doubt there is. Joash, king
of Judah, appeared to everyone very holy and good, so long as Jehoiada
the priest lived. But as soon as he died the religion of Joash died at
the same time (2 Chronicles 24:2). Judas Iscariot's outward life was as
correct as that of any of the apostles up to the time that he betrayed
his Master. There was nothing suspicious about him. Yet in reality he
was "a thief" and a traitor (John 12:6).
Is there not a false "love and kindness?" Without a doubt there is. The
is a love which consists in words and tender expressions, and a great
show of affection, and calling other people "dear brethren," while the
heart does not love at all. It is not for nothing that John says, "Let
us not love with words or tongue but with actions and in truth."
It was not without cause that Paul said: "Love must be sincere." (1 John
3:18; Romans 12:19).
Is there not a false "humility?" Without a doubt there is. There is a
pretended meekness of demeanor, which often covers over a very proud
heart. Paul warns us against a "forced humility," and speaks of "having
an appearance of wisdom, with their self-imposed worship, their false
humility" (Colossians 2:18, 23).
Is there not a false "praying?" Without a doubt there is. Our Lord
denounces it as one of the special sins of the Pharisees--that for a
"show make lengthy prayers" (Matthew 23:14). He does not charge them
with not praying, or with praying short prayers. Their sin lay in this,
that their prayers were not authentic.
Is there not a false "worship?" Without a doubt there is. Our Lord said
of the Jews: "These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are
far from me" (Matthew 15:8). They had plenty of formal services in their
temples and their synagogues. But the fatal defect about them was want
of authenticity and heart.
Is there not a lot of false "talking" about religion? Without a doubt
there is. Ezekiel describes some professing Jews who talked and spoke
like God's people "but their hearts are greedy for unjust gain" (Ezekiel
33:31). Paul tells us that we may "speak in the tongues of men and of
angels," and yet be no better than a resounding gong or a clanging
cymbal. (1 Corinthians 13:1).
What shall we say about these things? To say the least they ought to set
us thinking. To my own mind they seem to lead to only one conclusion.
They show clearly the immense importance which Scripture attaches to
authenticity in religion. They show clearly we need to be careful lest
our Christianity turn out to be merely nominal, formal, unreal, and
inferior.
The subject is of deep importance in every age. There has never been a
time, since the Church of Jesus Christ was founded, when there has not
been a vast amount of trivial and mere nominal religion among professing
Christians. I am sure it is the case in the present day. Wherever I
turn my eyes I see abundant cause for the warning, "Beware of inferior
religion. Be genuine. Be thorough. Be authentic. Be true."
How much religion among some members of the Church consists of "nothing
but churchmanship!" They belong to the Established Church. They are
baptized in her baptistery, married in her sanctuary, preached to on
Sundays by her ministers. But the great doctrines and truths preached
from her pulpits have no place in their hearts, and no influence on their
lives. They neither think, nor feel, nor care, nor know anything about
them. And is the religion of these people authentic Christianity? It is
nothing of the kind. It is a cheap imitation. It is not the
Christianity of Peter, and James, and John, and Paul. It is
"Churchianity," and no more.
How much religion among some Independents consists of "nothing but
disagreement!" They pride themselves on having nothing to do with the
formal denomination church. They rejoice in having no ritual, no forms,
no bishops. They glory in the exercise of their private judgment, and
the absence of everything ceremonial in their public worship. But all
this time they have neither grace, nor faith, nor repentance, nor
holiness, nor spirituality of conduct or conversation. The experimental
and practical piety of the old Separatist is a thing of which they are
utterly destitute. Their Christianity is as sapless and fruitless as a
dead tree, and as dry and marrowless as an old bone. And is the
Christianity of these people authentic? It is nothing of the kind. It
is cheap imitation. It is not the Christianity of the Reformers of the
past. It is "Nonconformity" and nothing more.
How much Ritualistic religion is utterly false! You will sometimes see
men boiling over with zeal about outward expressions of worship such as
church music and order of service, while their hearts are manifestly in
the world. Of the inward work of the Holy Spirit--of living faith in the
Lord Jesus--of delight in the Bible and religious conversation--of
separation from worldly silliness and entertainment--of zeal for the
conversion of souls to Christ--of all these things they are profoundly
ignorant. And is this kind of Christianity authentic? It is nothing of
the kind. It is a mere name.
How much Evangelical religion is completely make believe? You will
sometimes see men professing great affection for the pure "Gospel," while
they are, practically speaking, inflicting on it the greatest injury.
They will talk loudly of soundness in the faith, and have a keen nose for
heresy. They will run eagerly after popular preachers, and applaud
evangelical speakers at public meetings. They are familiar with all the
phrases of evangelical religion, and can converse fluently about its
leading doctrines. To see their faces at public meetings, or in church,
you would think they were eminently godly. To hear them talk you would
suppose their lives were tied up all kinds of religious activity. And
yet these people in private will sometimes do things of which even some
heathens would be ashamed. They are neither truthful, nor sincere, nor
honest, nor just, nor good-tempered, nor unselfish, nor merciful, nor
humble, nor kind! And is such Christianity as this authentic? It is
not. It is a worthless fake, a wretched cheat and farce.
How much Revivalist religion in the present day is utterly false! You
will find a crowd of false believers bringing discredit on the work of
God wherever the Holy Spirit is poured out. How many people today will
profess to be suddenly convinced of sin, to find peace in Jesus--to be
overwhelmed with joys and ecstasies of soul--while in authenticity of
religion they have no grace at all. Like the "rocky-soil" hearers, they
endure but for a short time. "In the time of testing they fall away"
(Luke 8:13). As soon as the first excitement has passed, they return to
their old ways, and resume their former sins. Their religion is like
Jonah's gourd, which came up in a night and perished in a night. They
have neither root nor vitality. They only injure God's cause and give
occasion to God's enemies to blaspheme. And is Christianity like this
authentic? It is nothing of the kind. It is a cheap imitation from the
devil's mint, and is worthless in God's sight.
I write these things with sorrow. I have no desire to bring any section
of the Church of Christ into contempt. I have no wish to cast any slur
on any movement which begins with the Spirit of God. But the times
demand very plain speaking about some points in the prevailing