Read & Study the Bible Online - Bible Portal
Charles John Ellicott

Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers - Daniel 5:7

(7) The astrologers.—It is worthy of notice that on this occasion the magicians (the chartummim) do not appear. We must either suppose that they are included under the general term “Chaldeans,” or that the king in his terror forgot to summon them. The “wise men” spoken of (Daniel 5:8) were the body over which Daniel was president—a post which it appears. from Daniel 8:27, he held at this time. It is needless to discuss why Daniel did not come in at first.The third ruler.—See Excursus C. Those... read more

Charles John Ellicott

Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers - Daniel 5:8

(8) Then—i.e., after the king had addressed the wise men whom he had summoned. But why could not they read an inscription which Daniel deciphered at first sight? It has been conjectured (1) that the character was old Semitic, or one which the wise men did not know; (2) that the language of the inscription was unknown to them; (3) that the words were written in vertical columns, and the wise men endeavoured to read them horizontally. The only true explanation is to be found in the supernatural... read more

Charles John Ellicott

Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers - Daniel 5:9

(9) The terror of Belshazzar and his lords is caused by the impression that the inability of the wise men to read the inscription is the portent of some terrible calamity. read more

Charles John Ellicott

Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers - Daniel 5:10

(10) By reason of the words.—The noise and confusion in the banquet-hall was heard by the queen-mother in her apartments. Her respect for Daniel is evident from her language. The position which she held was one of influence, for it appears that her advice was no sooner offered than it was accepted. read more

Charles John Ellicott

Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers - Daniel 5:11

(11) The spirit.—Comp. Daniel 4:8-9.Thy father.—No blood relationship is necessarily implied by this word. It means no more than “predecessor.” (See Introd., sec. VI.) read more

Charles John Ellicott

Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers - Daniel 5:12

(12) Forasmuch as.—The effect of these words is to combine the two facts mentioned in Daniel 5:11, and to make the advice at the end of this verse more forcible. “Because Daniel is a wise man, and has proved his wisdom in the days of Nebuchadnezzar, therefore send for him now.”Dissolving of doubts.—See marginal alternative; and for an illustration comp. Records of the Past, vol. iii., p. 141. read more

Charles John Ellicott

Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers - Daniel 5:13

(13) And the king spake.—The words of the queen-mother, especially her mention of the circumstance that Daniel’s name had been changed to Beltehazzar, at once recalls the whole of the circumstances to the king’s mind. That Belshazzar knew him by reputation is plain from the description given of him at the end of the verse: “which art of the children of the captivity of Judah.”Art thou that Daniel?—He calls him by his Hebrew name, so as to avoid one which sounded so much like his own. Daniel was... read more

Charles John Ellicott

Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers - Daniel 5:15

(15) The thing—i.e., the whole of this miraculous transaction. read more

Charles John Ellicott

Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers - Daniel 5:17

(17) Let thy gifts be to thyself.—Daniel refused the king’s offer of reward at first, but afterwards accepted it. In this way he showed his determination to speak the truth without any respect to fee, gift, or reward. (Comp. the conduct of Elisha, 2 Kings 5:16; 2 Kings 8:9.) read more

Charles John Ellicott

Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers - Daniel 5:18

(18) The most high God.—Comp. this and the three following verses with Daniel 4:16-17; Daniel 4:22-25. read more

Group of Brands