Verses 19-23
Matthew 2:19-Isaiah : . The Settlement at Nazareth.— By Herod’ s will Archelaus (p. 609) held the title of King till the Emperor Augustus forbade it. In Galilee, another of Herod’ s sons, Antipas (p. 609), was tetrarch. There is here no thought that Nazareth (p. 29) was Joseph’ s previous home. He goes there because ( a) Judæ a might be dangerous, ( b) prophecy must be fulfilled. For Mt. the question of the Messiah’ s birthplace does not arise; Joseph and Mary live in Bethlehem, and it would be there. Lk.’ s knowledge of Nazareth is better than Mt.’ s. The closest OT connexion with Matthew 2:23 is that Is., Jer., and Zeph. refer to Messiah as the branch ( Nezer) of the house of David. “ Nazarenes” was a contemptuous name given to the early Christians; Mt., to consecrate it, snatches at the faintest prophetic allusion ( cf. Acts 2:22 *). It is curious that Nazareth is not mentioned in OT, Josephus, or the Talmud, but that seven miles from the present village there was Bethlehem of Zebulun ( Joshua 19:15), called in the Talmud “ Zoriyah” (?=Notzeriyah), i.e. the Nazarene (or Galilean) Bethlehem. Did Jesus really belong to this place? The double name “ Bethlehem-Nazareth” might easily account for the variant tradition as to His birthplace.
Be the first to react on this!