마태복음 22:27-29 KRV

The Pulpit Commentary - Matthew 22:23-33

The Sadducees. I. THEIR CASE OF CASUISTRY . 1 . Their doctrine. They held that there was no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit ( Acts 23:8 ). Some of them now came to Christ, asserting their unbelief. They had not hitherto, like the Pharisees, taken a decided stand against our Lord. The chief priests, indeed, who were Sadducees, had been provoked into hostility by our Lord's action in the temple; but we do not read of Sadducees, as such, joining in the opposition against... read more

Spence, H. D. M., etc.

The Pulpit Commentary - Matthew 22:23-33

The resurrection of the dead. When Jesus had disposed of the Pharisees and Herodians, the Sadducees approached him. They were the physicists—the materialists—of their time, who did not believe in angels or spirits, and accounted as a thing incredible the resurrection of the dead. They urged a ease which they deemed conclusive against the latter, which is recorded here ( Matthew 22:23-28 ). We are chiefly concerned with our Lord's reply ( Matthew 22:29-32 ). Hence we learn— I. THAT ... read more

Spence, H. D. M., etc.

The Pulpit Commentary - Matthew 22:27

The woman died also. This last word is omitted by Alford, Tischendorf, and Westcott and Hort, and seemingly with good reason. Then, according to these Sadducees, arose the difficulty which they deemed insurmountable. read more

Spence, H. D. M., etc.

The Pulpit Commentary - Matthew 22:28

In the resurrection; i.e. in the life beyond the grave, to which the resurrection is supposed to lead. Whose wife shall she be of the seven? Of which of the seven shall she be wife ( γυνη ì , without the article, predicate)? The evil question stands in its naked absurdity. Had the woman a son by either of the husbands, the difficulty would have been less pronounced. In their coarse materialism, these persons carry their conceptions of the present visible world into the future... read more

Spence, H. D. M., etc.

The Pulpit Commentary - Matthew 22:29

Ye do err. Jesus does not condescend to answer directly to the contemptuous question proposed. He goes to the root of the matter, and shows the great error in which it originated. These disputants are treated with patience and calm argument, because they are not hypocrites like the Pharisees, but have the courage of their opinions, and do not seek to appear other than they are. They erred, said Christ, for two reasons: first, not knowing the Scriptures. Whatever might be the lax opinions... read more

Albert Barnes

Albert Barnes' Notes on the Whole Bible - Matthew 22:23-33

Conversation of Jesus with the Sadducees respecting the resurrection - See also Mark 12:18-27; Luke 20:27-38.Matthew 22:23The same day came the Sadducees - For an account of the Sadducees, see the notes at Matthew 3:7.No resurrection - The word “resurrection” usually means the raising up the “body” to life after it is dead, John 11:24; John 5:29; 1 Corinthians 15:22. But the Sadducees not only denied this, but also a future state, and the separate existence of the soul after death altogether,... read more

Joseph Benson

Joseph Benson's Commentary of the Old and New Testaments - Matthew 22:24-28

Matthew 22:24-28. Master, Moses said, If a man die, &c. “The argument by which the Sadducees endeavoured to confute the notion of a future state was taken from the Jewish law of marriage, which, to give their objection the better colour, they observed was God’s law, delivered by Moses. As they believed the soul to be nothing but a more refined kind of matter, they thought if there was any future state, it must resemble the present; and, that men being in that state material and mortal,... read more

Joseph Benson

Joseph Benson's Commentary of the Old and New Testaments - Matthew 22:29-30

Matthew 22:29-30. Jesus answered, Ye do err, not knowing the Scriptures Which plainly assert a future state; nor the power of God Who created spirit as well as matter, and can preserve it in existence when the body is dissolved, and can also raise the body from the dust and render it immortal; and who can make the whole man completely happy in the knowledge, love, and enjoyment of himself, without any of the pleasures or objects of this visible and temporal world. For in the resurrection... read more

Donald C. Fleming

Bridgeway Bible Commentary - Matthew 22:23-33

126. Marriage and the resurrection (Matthew 22:23-33; Mark 12:18-27; Luke 20:27-40)Next a group of Sadducees came to Jesus with a question. According to the law of Moses, if a man died childless, his brother was to have a temporary marital relationship with the widow for the purpose of producing an heir (Deuteronomy 25:5-6). The question put by the Sadducees concerned an unlikely situation where a widow would meet seven husbands, all brothers, in the resurrection. Since Sadducees did not... read more

E.W. Bullinger

E.W. Bullinger's Companion Bible Notes - Matthew 22:27

last of all = at last, as in Matthew 21:37 . the woman died also = the woman also died. read more

The Pulpit Commentary - Matthew 22:23-33

The Pulpit Commentary - Matthew 22:23-33

The Pulpit Commentary - Matthew 22:27

The Pulpit Commentary - Matthew 22:28

The Pulpit Commentary - Matthew 22:29

Albert Barnes' Notes on the Whole Bible - Matthew 22:23-33

Joseph Benson's Commentary of the Old and New Testaments - Matthew 22:24-28

Joseph Benson's Commentary of the Old and New Testaments - Matthew 22:29-30

Bridgeway Bible Commentary - Matthew 22:23-33

E.W. Bullinger's Companion Bible Notes - Matthew 22:27

Group of Brands