1 Kings 5:1

PREPARATIONS FOR BUILDING THE TEMPLE

"And Hiram king of Tyre sent his servants unto Solomon; for he had heard that they had anointed him king in the room of his father: for Hiram was ever a lover of David. And Solomon sent to Hiram, saying, Thou knowest how that David my father could not build a house for the name of Jehovah his God for the wars which were about him on every side, until Jehovah put them under the soles of his feet. But now Jehovah my God hath given me rest on every side; there is neither adversary, nor evil occurrence. And, behold, 50purpose to build a house for the name of Jehovah my God, as Jehovah spake unto David my father, saying, Thy son, whom I will set upon my throne in my room, he shall build a house for my name. Now therefore command thou that they cut me cedar trees out of Lebanon; and my servants shall be with thy servants; and I will give thee hire for thy servants according to all that thou shalt say: for thou knowest that there is not among us any that knoweth how to cut timber like unto the Sidonians."

It is almost incredible to this writer that no commentator whom we have consulted has challenged Solomon's arrogant assumption in this passage that he himself was that promised `seed' of David whom God would establish eternally upon David's throne, declaring emphatically that, "I (God) will establish the throne of his kingdom forever (2 Samuel 7:13)."

The subsequent events in the history of David's earthly dynasty demonstrated most effectively the error of Solomon's conceited assumption. Furthermore, Solomon had been elevated to David's throne during David's lifetime, with whom, for a season, Solomon Was actually co-regent; and the promise of 2 Samuel 7:12 regarding that `seed' whose throne would last for ever stressed that he would rise at a time, "When David should sleep with his fathers and after David's days on earth had been fulfilled." (See our full discussion of this in our Commentary on Second Samuel in chapter 7.)

Solomon is not the only one who misunderstood that heavenly promise; because the Jewish people themselves quickly concluded that the extravaganza of Solomon's kingdom was scheduled to last eternally. However, the enormous taxation, the forced labor, and the heartless selfishness of Solomon's reign quickly issued in the resentment and bitterness that split the kingdom.

AN EARTHLY TEMPLE WHICH GOD DID NOT WANT

The fact of God's accommodation to Solomon's Temple, and his use of it during the following history of Israel should not obscure that fact that God had made it perfectly clear to David that God did not Desire a Temple (2 Samuel 7:4-7). In that passage, God stated that he had never said to any Israelite, "build me a house (temple)." And we must point out that God never commanded Solomon to build him a house. If so, where is the commandment? It was Solomon's project, first, last, and always. In our whole series of Bible Commentaries, we have frequently stressed the fact of both the monarchy and the Temple being contrary to God's will. If it had not been so, why would God have destroyed it twice?

It is refreshing to note that La Sor, writing in The New Bible Commentary (Revised) raised a question: "Solomon utilized the skills of the Phoenicians, the slave-labor of conquered peoples, and the enforced labor of the Israelites, even mortgaging a part of his kingdom; and at last he had a splendid Temple, and probably an even more splendid palace. But was it right"?[1] Of course, La Sor assumed it was right, basing his assumption upon the fact that God surely used it, but we cannot believe that God's use of the Temple was any more proof of its being right than was his use of the monarchy.

That Temple proved to be a millstone around the necks of God's people as long as it stood. As Stephen the Martyr observed in his Farewell Address, "All of God's great victories for Israel came, not in the days of the Temple, but in those of the Tabernacle" (Acts 7:44-46). Furthermore, Stephen's remark, that, "Solomon built him (God) a house" can be nothing but sarcasm. Also, the sacred author of Hebrews made no mention whatever of Solomon's Temple, but repeatedly stressed the significance of the Tabernacle. This bypass of Solomon's Temple by the inspired author of Hebrews is extremely significant. It is obvious that God never approved of the Temple.

What is wrong with a Temple? As Stephen put it, "God dwelleth not in Temples made with hands" (Acts 7:39). What is wrong with a temple, any temple? It purports to say that "God is there," but that is a lie. The Temple of Solomon became a center of pagan worship (Ezekiel 8); and that prophet recorded the departure of God's Spirit from it (Ezekiel 10-11).

"I will give thee hire, ... according to all that thou shalt say (1 Kings 5:6). "This amount was so enormous (according to 1 Kings 5:11,220,000 bushels of wheat and 180,000 gallons of oil) that we are not surprised to find out later that Solomon apparently went bankrupt and had to cede part of his territory to settle the debt."[2]

This alliance with Hiram king of Tyre was mutually advantageous both to him and to Solomon. "The corn-growing (wheat) districts of northern Palestine were the granary of the Phoenicians in the times of Solomon, no less than in the days of Herod (Acts 12:20)."[3] Also Solomon controlled the trade routes both from the East and from Egypt.

Solomon's arrangement here with Hiram was to procure sufficient timber for the proposed Temple from the great cedar forests of Lebanon, which were controlled by Hiram, and which were located, "Two days journey north of Beirut by the village of Bjerreh on the way to Baalbek near the loftiest summit of the Lebanon Mountains."[4] "Hiram also agreed to bring the timber down, probably via the Dog River to the Mediterranean, and thence by raft to a harbor in Israel."[5] The account in Chronicles identifies that harbor as Joppa (2 Chronicles 2:16).