Genesis 3:6 - Homiletics

The first sin.

I. THE TEMPTATION .

1. The fact . That sin is possible even in pure beings without the intervention of solicitation, at least ab extra , must be held to be the doctrine of Scripture ( vide James 1:14 and Jud James 1:6 ). Hence man might have fallen, even had he not been tempted. The fact, however, that he was tempted is explicitly revealed; a circumstance which notes an important distinction between his sin and that of the angels. Does this explain Hebrews 2:16 and 2 Peter 2:4 ?

2. The author . Though ostensibly a serpent, in reality the devil. Besides being expressly stated in the inspired word, it is involved in the very terms of the Mosaic narrative. If the reptile possessed the malice to conceive and the skill to manage such an assault upon the first pair as this book describes, then clearly it was not a serpent , but a devil . It is doubtful if all man's temptations come from the devil, but many, perhaps most, do. He is pre-eminently styled "the tempter" ( Matthew 4:3 ; 1 Thessalonians 3:5 ). From the days of Adam downward he has been engaged in attempting to seduce the saints; e.g. David ( 1 Chronicles 21:1 ); Job ( Genesis 2:7 ); Christ ( Luke 4:13 ); Ananias and Sapphira ( Acts 5:3 ). At the present moment he is laboring to deceive the whole world ( Revelation 12:9 ).

3. The instrument . The serpent, which was a proof of Satan's skill, that particular reptile being specially adapted for his purpose ( N . B .—The devil can always find a tool adapted to the work he has in hand); and is an indication of our danger, it being only a reptile, and therefore little likely to be suspected as a source of peril; whence we may gather that there is no quarter so unexpected, and no instrument so feeble, that out of the one and through the other temptation may not leap upon us.

4. The nature . This was threefold. A temptation

(Cf. the three assaults upon the Second Adam ( Matthew 4:1 ; Luke 4:1 ), which were essentially the same.) The first aimed a death-blow at their filial confidence in God; the second removed the fear of punishment from their path; the third fired their souls with the lust of ambition. Separation from God, disobedience of God, opposition to or rivalry with God—the devil's scala coeli .

5. The subtlety . That great art should have been displayed in the conduct of this campaign against the citadel of human holiness is what might have been expected from such a general. In these respects it was evinced.

II. THE TRANSGRESSION .

1. Its guilty perpetrators . Not the serpent or the devil, but the first pair. The devil may tempt man to sin, but he cannot sin for man. A creature may be the unconscious instrument of leading man aside from the path of virtue, but it cannot possibly compel man to go astray. Men are prone to blame other things and persons for their sins, when the true criminals are themselves.

2. Its impelling motive . No temptation, however skillfully planned or powerfully applied, can succeed until it finds a footing in the nature that is tempted. Unless the devil's logic and chicanery had produced the effect described in verse 6, it is more than probable that Eve would have stood. But first it wrought a change upon herself, and then it transformed the tree. First it created the need for sinful motives, and then it supplied them. So works temptation still. As with Eve, so with us. Sinful motives are

3. Its essential wickedness , as consisting of

the fundamental elements in all sin, corresponding to the three fundamental elements of man's being and consciousness—spirit, soul, body (cf. Auberlen's ' Divine Revelation,' Part I ; § 3, Genesis 9:1-29 .).

4. Its sad results .

Lessons : —

1. The responsibility of man.

2. The duty of guarding against temptation.

3. The contagious character of moral evil.

4. The havoc wrought by a single sin.