Exodus 16:1-3 - Exposition

1 . The fact that the Egyptian settlements in the Sinaitic peninsula would thus be avoided, as they seem to have been, since no contest with Egyptians is recorded;

2 . The descent of the quails, who, wearied with a long flight over the Red Sea, would naturally settle as soon as they reached the shore;

3 . The greater openness and facility of the El Markha and Wady Feiran route, which is admitted by all; and

4 . The suitability of the latter to the particulars of the narrative in Exodus 18:1-27 .

In favour of the route by the Debbet-er-Ramleh are,

1. The fact that it is better watered at present than the other;

2 . Its being somewhat less removed from the direct line between Wady Ghurundel and Sinai than El Markha; and

3 . A certain correspondency of sound or meaning between some of the present geographical names along this route and those of the Mosaic narrative. In "the wilderness of Sin" the Israelites for the first time found themselves in want of sufficient nourishment. They hall consumed the grain which they had brought with them out of Egypt; and though no doubt they had still considerable flocks and herds, yet they were unaccustomed to a mere milk and flesh diet, having in Egypt lived principally upon bread ( Exodus 18:3 ), fish ( Numbers 11:5 ), and vegetables ( ibid. ). They therefore "murmured," and accused Moses and Aaron of an intention to starve them. It is quite possible that many of the poorer sorts having brought with them no cattle, or lost their cattle by the way, and not being helped by their brethren, were in actual danger of starvation. Hence God was not angry, but "heard their murmurings" ( Exodus 18:9 ) patiently, and relieved them.