Nehemiah 13:4-9 - Homiletics

An intruder ejected.

In these verses we have an account of a gross abuse, of authority by the high priest, and how it was corrected by Nehemiah.

I. THE OFFENCE . Turning rooms in the courts of the temple, intended and used as store-rooms for tithes and offerings, etc; into a residence for Tobiah on his visits to Jerusalem. In verse 5 we read of "a great chamber;" in verse 9 of "chambers." Perhaps several rooms were thrown into one; or the word in verse 5 may be, as in verse 4, collective.

1. The perversion was itself disgraceful. It may have occasioned the neglect recorded in verse 10,

2. The person for whom it was committed was not only an alien, but an enemy.

3. The person who committed it was the appointed guardian of the rooms. As high priest, he should have been too jealous of the sanctity of the temple; as "having the oversight of the chamber of the house of God," he should have been too faithful to his duty; as head of the priests and Levites, too concerned for their rights and welfare, to be willing to permit, much less to perpetrate, such an abuse.

II. HOW THE OFFENCE CAME TO BE PERMITTED .

1. Nehemiah was absent. In his absence affairs fell rapidly into disorder again. A painful illustration of the superficiality of reforms wrought hastily under the influence of powerful leaders.

2. Tobiah was a great man.

3. He was a relative of Eliashib.

4. Eliashib was unworthy of his office. He was more concerned to stand well with Tobiah than to do his duty to God and his brethren. Probably he was disaffected towards Nehemiah and his reforms, and thought that now he was gone he could do as he pleased.

III. HOW THE OFFENCE WAS CORRECTED . Nehemiah, returning to Jerusalem, and being informed of what had been done, was very indignant, and at once took measures to put an end to the scandal. Under his direction—

1. Tobiah's furniture was summarily ejected.

2. The rooms were purified from the ceremonial uncleanness they had contracted.

3. They were restored to their proper use. The narrative suggests—