1 Timothy 1:4

4. Fables The “Jewish fables” of Titus 1:14; in 1 Timothy 4:7, they are termed “profane and old wives’ fables;” and in 2 Timothy 4:4, simply “fables.” These innovators, verging into heresy and apostasy, and leading a part of the Church after them, are Jews. Of these fables the Talmud was a great repository. Says Clarke: “I will give one instance from the Jerusalem Targum, on Genesis 1:15: ‘And God made two great lights, and they were equal in splendour twenty-one years, the six hundred and seventy-second part of an hour excepted: and afterwards the moon brought a false accusation against the sun, and therefore she was lessened; and God made the sun the greater light to superintend the day,’ etc. I could produce a thousand of a similar complexion.” Commentary. 1 Timothy 1:7.

The Targums were very liberal translations or paraphrases of the Old Testament books, prepared for the people after the captivity, who had forgotten their pure Hebrew dialect. The Talmud was a collection of the teachings and traditions of the Rabbies, filled with a mixture of noble moralities and most extravagant inventions. “Such,” says Grotius, “were with the Jews the fables concerning what God did before the world was created; concerning man, created at first hermaphrodite; concerning his concubitus with beasts, and with Lilith; concerning demons and those born from them; concerning behemoth and leviathan; concerning the existence of souls before the body; concerning the angels distributed into the stars and aerial regions.” Tertullian says that Valentinus, the Gnostic, “introduced many fables.” “Such worthless stories,” says Schaff, “are still found, as is well known, in the Talmud and in the Cabala, ( Cabala-tradition,) the elements of which confessedly existed in the first century, probably even before the destruction of Jerusalem.” For a good account of the Cabala, see M’Clintock and Strong’s Cyclopedia.

Endless genealogies As to what these genealogies were, Alford adduces six different suppositions. It is clear that we must look for these genealogies, as for the forementioned fables, among the Jews. And this excludes the Gnostic emanations, by which existing things were traced back to their origin through a series of generative developments from the original Pleroma. For an account of these see Pressense’s Heresy and Christian Doctrine, book 1. We must also reject the Old Testament genealogies, and the Jewish family genealogies; for these could form no part of a heresy in Christianity. These genealogies were, rather, allegorical theories and phantasies, based upon mystical interpretations of the Old Testament genealogical registers. Of these we have specimens in Philo, who finds plenty of Platonic and Oriental philosophy in the Old Testament mystically interpreted. “Genealogical” is a term which he himself applies to his allegories. They were fresh inventions of liberalizing Jews, who endeavoured to find all the wisdom of “modern thought” wrapped up in the letter of the Old Testament books, and to be unfolded by drawing out a concealed sense. In Ephesus and Crete, this doctrine would substitute for Christianity a mystical blend of the Jewish letter with Oriental philosophy. These genealogies are called endless, as they could be spun out at will by the imaginative allegorizer; and every new allegorizer could add a new spin; so that the whole system was interminable. Still more truly interminable because they led to no satisfactory conclusions, but induced questions for ever and ever, without solid or saving answers, as to the true system or constitution of things.

Rather than godly edifying Better, rather than the (actual) system of God. This true system is given in a true interpretation of the Old Testament, and results in Jesus the Messiah and the gospel. Here we have solid reality; there nothing but endless questions.

In faith With the Greek article before it, the system of God which is embraced in our faith, and consequently results not in questions, but in divine composure of mind.