Name: Does Romans 8:11 Imply a Phyiscal Resurrection? A Response to David Wood
Uploaded: 2010-09-22T04:02:04.000000Z
Duration: 5 min 29 s
Description: In this video Ehteshaam Gulam responds to David Wood on what Paul is talking about in Romans 8:11---and why this verse in no way implies that Jesus was phyiscally resurrected.

My Name is Ehteshaam Gulam and The Purpose of this channel is to defend Islam and refute the claims of Christian Apologists. 

MY WEBSITE: 

http://www.answering-christian-claims.com/

For Islamic Dawah (Islamic Preaching) Purposes



Refuting Christianity: 
http://ehrmanblog.org/
http://www.richardcarrier.info/
http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/
http://shabirally.wordpress.com/

Islamic Websites/Islamic apologetic websites: 

http://www.letmeturnthetables.com/
http://www.call-to-monotheism.com/what_s_new_
http://www.islamic-awareness.org/
http://www.muslim-responses.com/
http://theinimitablequran.com/

AnsweringChristians1

In this video Ehteshaam Gulam responds to David Wood on what Paul is talking about in Romans 8:11---and why this verse in no way implies that Jesus was phyiscally resurrected.

Does Romans 8:11 Imply a Phyiscal Resurrection? A Response to David Wood

AnsweringChristians1

Group of Brands