Like the first controversy (2: 1-12), the fifth controversy is an interweaving of a miracle and a debate showing that Jesus is powerful in both word and deed. Mark’s audience, for whom the Gospel was written, were constantly drawn into a debate with Rabbinic Judaism of the first century on their ‘Christian observances’ of the Sabbath which were more liberal compared to strict Pharisaic practices. This narrative would thus serve as a point of defence of the Early Church’s free attitude towards the Sabbath.
The problem in this episode lies in the nature of illness and the timing of the miracle. Jewish Rabbis were known to permit healings on the Sabbath in cases where the life of a person was threatened by illnesses. In this case the man’s had was withered, a condition that could have been so from birth and hence not life threatening. The Pharisees had figured out the compassionate heart of Jesus and knew that He of all people would never walk by; and so they “watched Him” so that they might “accuse Him”.