Read & Study the Bible Online - Bible Portal
Francois Fenelon

Francois Fenelon

Francois Fenelon (1651 - 1715)

He was inducted into the Acadmie Francaise in 1693 and named Archbishop of Cambrai in 1695. During his time as the educator and teacher of the Duke, Fenelon wrote several entertaining and educational works, including the extensive novel Les Aventures de Telemaque, fils d'Ulysse (The Adventures of Telemachus, son of Ulysses), which depicted the ideal of a wise king. When this novel began circulating anonymously among the court, having been fragmentarily published in 1699 without his knowledge, Louis XIV, who saw many criticisms of his absolutistic style of rule in Telemaque, stopped the printing and banned Fenelon from court. Fenelon then retreated to his bishopric in Cambrai, where he remained active writing theological and political treatises until his death on January 17, 1715.

In Church history, Fenelon is known especially for his part in the Quietism debate with his earlier patron Bossuet. In his work Explication des maximes des Saints sur la vie interieure (Explanation of the Adages of the Saints on the Inner Life) in 1697, he defended Madame du Guyon, the main representative of Quietistic mysticism. He provided proof that her "heretical" teachings could also be seen in recognized saints. In 1697, Fenelon called on the pope for a decision in the Quietism debate. After long advisement, the Pope banned the Explication in 1699. Fenelon complied with the pope's decision immediately and allowed the remaining copies of his book to be destroyed.


Francois de Salignac de la Mothe-Fenelon, more commonly known as Francois Fenelon, was a French Roman Catholic theologian, poet and writer. He today is remembered mostly as one of the main advocates of quietism and as the author of The Adventures of Telemachus, a scabrous attack on the French monarchy, first published in 1699.

      Francois Fenelon (specifically Francois de Salignac de la Motte-Fenelon) was born on August 6, 1651, at Fenelon Castle in Perigord. Fenelon studied at the seminary Saint-Sulpice in Paris, where he was ordained as a priest. Fenelon published his pedagogical work Traite de l'education des filles (Treatise on the Education of Girls) in 1681, which brought him much attention, not only in France, but abroad as well. At this time, he met Jacques Benigne Bossuet, Bishop of Meaux, who soon became his patron and through whose influence Fenelon was contracted by Louis XIV to carry out the re-conversion of the Hugenots in the provinces of Saintonge and Poitou in 1686 and was appointed in 1689 as educator of his grandson and potential successor, the Duc de Bourgogne. Because of this position, he gained much influence at the court.

      He was inducted into the Academie Francaise in 1693 and named Archbishop of Cambrai in 1695. During his time as the educator and teacher of the Duke, Fenelon wrote several entertaining and educational works, including the extensive novel Les Aventures de Telemaque, fils d'Ulysse (The Adventures of Telemachus, son of Ulysses), which depicted the ideal of a wise king. When this novel began circulating anonymously among the court, having been fragmentarily published in 1699 without his knowledge, Louis XIV, who saw many criticisms of his absolutistic style of rule in Telemaque, stopped the printing and banned Fenelon from court. Fenelon then retreated to his bishopric in Cambrai, where he remained active writing theological and political treatises until his death on January 17, 1715.

      In Church history, Fenelon is known especially for his part in the Quietism debate with his earlier patron Bossuet. In his work Explication des maximes des Saints sur la vie interieure (Explanation of the Adages of the Saints on the Inner Life) in 1697, he defended Madame du Guyon, the main representative of Quietistic mysticism. He provided proof that her "heretical" teachings could also be seen in recognized saints. In 1697, Fenelon called on the pope for a decision in the Quietism debate. After long advisement, the Pope banned the Explication in 1699. Fenelon complied with the pope's decision immediately and allowed the remaining copies of his book to be destroyed.

... Show more
All soul is immortal. For that which is always in movement is immortal; that which moves something else, and is moved by something else, in ceasing from movement ceases from living. So only that which moves itself, because it does not abandon itself, never stops moving. But it is also source and first principle of movement for the other things which move. Now a first principle is something which does not come into being. For all that comes into being must come into being from a first principle, but a first principle itself cannot come into being from anything at all; for if a first principle came into being from anything, it would not do so from a first principle. Since it is something that does not come into being, it must also be something which does not perish. For if a first principle is destroyed, neither will it ever come into being from anything itself nor will anything else come into being from it, given that all things must come into being from a first principle. It is in this way, then, that that which moves itself is a first principle of movement. It is not possible for this either to be destroyed or to come into being, or else the whole universe and the whole of that which comes to be might collapse together and come to a halt, and never again have a source from which things will be moved and come to be. And since that which is moved by itself has been shown to be immortal, it will incur no shame to say that this is the essence and the definition of the soul
5 likes
Neoptolemus: I am glad to see you and take you as a friend. For one who knows how to show and accept kindness will be a better friend than any possession.
4 likes
I have seen or heard of no other man whom destiny treated with such enmity as it did Philoktetes
4 likes
Misanthropy develops when without art one puts complete trust in somebody thinking the man absolutely true and sound and reliable and then a little later discovers him to be bad and unreliable ... and when it happens to someone often ... he ends up ... hating everyone
topics: misanthropy  
4 likes
الشخص الذي يعرف كيف يقدم المعروف وكيف يتقبله يكون دائماً صديقاً أفضل من ثروات الدنيا كلها.
4 likes
إن الإبحار يكون جيداً في كل الأحوال إذا كان المرء يهرب من المصائب.
3 likes
If it is pure when it leaves the body and drags nothing bodily with it, as it had no willing association with the body in life, but avoided it and gathered itself together by itself and always practiced this, which is no other than practicing philosophy in the right way, in fact, training to die easily. Or is this not training for death?
3 likes
Les amants, en effet, regrettent le bien qu’ils ont fait, une fois que leur désir est éteint. Ceux qui n’ont pas d’amour, au contraire, n’ont jamais occasion seyante au repentir, car ce n’est point par contrainte, mais librement, comme s’ils s’occupaient excellemment des biens de leurs demeures, qu’ils font, dans la mesure de leurs moyens, du bien à leurs amis. Les amants considèrent en outre, et les dommages que leur amour fit à leurs intérêts et les largesses qu’ils ont dû consentir ; puis, en y ajoutant la peine qu’ils ont eue, ils pensent depuis longtemps avoir déjà payé à leurs aimés le juste prix des faveurs obtenues. Par contre, ceux qui ne sont pas épris ne peuvent, ni prétexter les affaires négligées par amour, ni mettre en ligne de compte les souffrances passées, ni alléguer les différends familiaux qu’ils ont eus. Exempts de tous ces maux, il ne leur reste plus qu’à s’empresser de mettre en acte tout ce qu’ils croient devoir leur donner du plaisir.
3 likes
The lovers of learning know that when philosophy gets hold of their soul, it is imprisoned in and clinging to the body, and that it is forced to examine other things through it as through a cage and not by itself, and that it wallows in every kind of ignorance. Philosophy sees that the worst feature of this imprisonment is that it is due to desires, so that the prisoner himself is contributing to his own incarceration most of all. As I say, the lovers of learning know that philosophy gets hold of their soul when it is in that state, then gently encourages it and tries to free it by showing them that investigation through the eyes is full of deceit, as is that through the ears and the other senses.
3 likes
The chief thing is not to listen to yourself, but silently to give ear to God. It is to renounce all vanity, and apply yourself to real virtue. Talk little, and do much without caring to be seen. God will teach you more than all the most experienced persons or the most spiritual books can do. What is it you want so much to know? What do you need to learn but to be poor in spirit and to find all wisdom in Christ crucified? “Knowledge puffs up.” Only “love builds up.”5 Be content to aim at charity.
3 likes
حتى من يتصفون بالمكر تزل أقدامهم ويسقطون أحياناً.
2 likes
لا داعي للغضب عندما يقول من يمزق قلبه الحزن والأسى كلاماً غير منطقي.
2 likes
من المحتم علينا نحن البشر أن نتحمل ما ترسله إلنا الآلهة من أقدار. ولكنكل من يدامون على الخضوع لمعاناتهم مثلك، هؤلاء لن يشعر أحد بالشفقة تجاههم، أو ييجد لهم عذراً.
2 likes
فإن العقل الذي يصبح مصدراً للأفعال الشريرة يعلم صاحبه كيف يكون شريراً في كل شئ.
2 likes
إن التقوى لا تموت. وسواء أكان البشر أحياء أم أمواتاَ، فإن التقوى لا تموت.
2 likes
فإن المرء، عندما تتاح له الفرصة ويضع في حسبانه جميع الأمور، يمكنه أن يحرز الانتصار.
2 likes
أفضل الأعمال ما نقوم به دون خوف.
2 likes
The soul that has conceived one wickedness can nurse no good thereafter.
topics: good , nurse , soul , wickedness  
2 likes
إن البشر الذين ينشرون الفوضى ولا ينصاعون للقواعد أصبحوا كذلك بسبب من يقودونهم.
2 likes
إن الموت لا يأخذ أبداً رجلاً شريراً، ولكنه ينتقي الأفضل دائماً.
2 likes

Group of Brands