●▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬●
This Channel is NOT about a religious denomination, nor their pet-doctrines. This Channel is for the glory of Jesus Christ, it provide in-depth and comprehensive Bible studies for those who desire a deeper look into Scripture. There are two principles of interpreting, one is Eisegesis and the other is Exegesis. Exegesis and eisegesis are two conflicting approaches in Bible study. Exegesis is the exposition of a text based on a careful, objective analysis. The word exegesis literally means 'to lead out of.' That means the interpreter is led to his conclusions by following the text. The opposite approach to Scripture is eisegesis, which is the interpretation of a passage based on a subjective, non-analytical reading. The word eisegesis literally means 'to lead into', which means the interpreter injects his own ideas into the text, making it mean whatever he wants.
●▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬●

Samuel Patterson

This video teaching - (Ezekiel 33:13) - is a part of an ongoing collective of videos addressing the flawed method of interpreting the Bible employed by those who oppose the doctrine of "Eternal security" or in short "Once saved always saved". They go to many different verses, both in the Old and New Testament to prove that a saved person can lose their salvation. Sad to say, they are guilty of a faulty method of interpreting called Eisegesis. Eisegesis Is the approach to Bible interpretation where the interpreter tries to "force" the Bible to mean something that fits their existing belief or understanding of a particular issue or doctrine:  People who interpret the Bible this way are usually not willing to let the Bible speak for itself and let the chips fall where they may.  They start off with the up-front goal of trying to prove a point they already believe in, and everything they read and interpret is filtered through that paradigm. Stated another way, they engage in what the Bible refers to as "private interpretation".

This video teaching - (Ezekiel 33:13) - is a part of an ongoing collective of videos addressing the flawed method of interpreting the Bible employed by those who oppose the doctrine of "Eternal security" or in short "Once saved always saved". They go to many different verses, both in the Old and New Testament to prove that a saved person can lose their salvation. Sad to say, they are guilty of a faulty method of interpreting called Eisegesis. Eisegesis Is the approach to Bible interpretation where the interpreter tries to "force" the Bible to mean something that fits their existing belief or understanding of a particular issue or doctrine:  People who interpret the Bible this way are usually not willing to let the Bible speak for itself and let the chips fall where they may.  They start off with the up-front goal of trying to prove a point they already believe in, and everything they read and interpret is filtered through that paradigm. Stated another way, they engage in what the Bible

"Ezekiel 33:13" - Explained, (Short version)

*Facebook Link:* https://www.facebook.com/brothersamuel100 
*Twitter Link:* https://twitter.com/brothersamuel10 
 
Numbers 23:19 and Hosea 11:9 are two bible verses which are often misrepresented by Muslims and other anti-trinitarian groups to prove that Jesus Christ in His very essence is not sharing in Godhood / Deity. Sadly such groups are guilty of a faulty method of interpreting called Eisegesis. Eisegesis is the approach to Bible interpretation where the interpreter tries to "force" the Bible to mean something that fits their existing belief or understanding of a particular issue or doctrine: People who interpret the Bible this way are usually not willing to let the Bible speak for itself and let the chips fall where they may. They start off with the up-front goal of trying to prove a point they already believe in, and everything they read and interpret is filtered through that paradigm. Stated another way, they engage in what the Bible refers to as "private interpretation". However, in this video teaching I perform a right exegesis on Numbers 23:19 & Hosea 11:9 and show their true meaning with respect to their proper context.

Facebook Link:* https://www.facebook.com/brothersamuel100 *Twitter Link:* https://twitter.com/brothersamuel10 Numbers 23:19 ...

'GOD IS NOT A MAN' | Numbers 23:19 &amp; Hosea 11:9, Explained.'

Bible translation used The New International Version || In this Bible lesson, I do a [ critical interpretation of the text of Scripture ] to pull out the true meaning of  2Thessalonians 2:6-9  in light of its context, in connection with what the Bible has to offer on the subject as a whole --- as it concerns the identity of the restrainer.

Bible translation used The New International Version || In this Bible lesson, I do a [ critical interpretation of the text of Scripture ] to ...

"Who is the Restrainer?" ( 2 Thessalonians 2:6-9 )

Matthew 7:21-22 is one of many verses misunderstood in the Bible, those who believe that true believers can lose their salvation attempt to use these verses to argue that a true Spirit born-again believer [ after being saved by God's grace ] can lose their salvation. In this lesson I do a [critical explanation of the text of Scripture] to pull out the true meaning of Matthew 7:21-22 in light of its context and its association with other Bible verses that can be easily connected to it. 
_____________________________________ 
Eisegesis is the approach to Bible interpretation where the interpreter tries to "force" the Bible to mean something that fits their existing belief or understanding of a particular issue or doctrine: People who interpret the Bible this way are usually not willing to let the Bible speak for itself and let the chips fall where they may. They start off with the up-front goal of trying to prove a point they already believe in, and everything they read and interpret is filtered through that paradigm. Stated another way, they engage in what the Bible refers to as "private interpretation". 
Exegesis is the process of approaching Bible interpretation with a humble spirit, and an open mind: In order to gain a true understanding of God's Word, one must be willing to allow God's Word to speak for itself, and be willing to abandon cherished beliefs if they are in conflict with God's Word: Proper exegesis includes using the context around the passage, comparing it with other parts of the Bible, and applying an understanding of the language and customs of the time of the writing, in an attempt to understand clearly what the original writer intended to convey. In other words, it is trying to "pull out" of the passage the meaning inherent in it. The opposite of exegesis is eisegesis, which is a person's particular interpretation of scriptures that are not evident in the text itself.

Matthew 7:21-22 is one of many verses misunderstood in the Bible, those who believe that true believers can lose their salvation ...

"Matthew 7:21-22 explained" - (Exegesis Vs. Eisegesis)

"Can a True Believer Be Blotted Out of the Book of Life?" This teaching explains  Revelation 3:5 in relationship to other Bible verses to bring out its true meaning. Some individuals advocate that true believers can lose their eternal salvation by misquoting Revelation 3:5. However, in this lesson we will examine this Bible verse to discover its true meaning. Revelation 3:5 says, "He who overcomes will thus be clothed in white garments; and I will NOT erase his name from the book of life, and I will confess his name before My Father and before His angels. He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches." Here Christ promises every believer that (1.) He will NOT erase his name from the book of life, and (2.) He will confess our names before the Father and before His angels. Incredibly, although the text says just the opposite, some people assume that this verse teaches that the believer's name can be erased from the book of life. They thus foolishly turn a promise into a threat. In John's day, rulers kept a register of the citizens of a city. If someone died, or committed a serious crime, their name was erased from that register. Christ, the King of heaven, promises never to erase a believers' name from the book of life.

"Can a True Believer Be Blotted Out of the Book of Life?" This teaching explains  Revelation 3:5 in relationship to other Bible verses to bring out its true meaning. Some individuals advocate that true believers can lose their eternal salvation by misquoting Revelation 3:5. However, in this lesson we will examine this Bible verse to discover its true meaning. Revelation 3:5 says, "He who overcomes will thus be clothed in white garments; and I will NOT erase his name from the book of life, and I will confess his name before My Father and before His angels. He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches." Here Christ promises every believer that (1.) He will NOT erase his name from the book of life, and (2.) He will confess our names before the Father and before His angels. Incredibly, although the text says just the opposite, some people assume that this verse teaches that the believer's name can be erased from the book of life. They thus foolishly turn a promise i

"Can true believers be blotted out of the book of Life?" ( Rev 3:5 )

1Timothy 4:1 is one of many verses misunderstood in the Bible, those who believe that true believers can lose their salvation attempt to use this verse to argue that a true Spirit born-again believer [ after being saved by God's grace ] can lose their salvation. In this lesson I do a [critical explanation of the text of Scripture] to pull out the true meaning of 1Timothy 4:1 in light of its context and its association with other Bible verses that can be easily connected to it. 
______________________________________________________________ 
Eisegesis is the approach to Bible interpretation where the interpreter tries to "force" the Bible to mean something that fits their existing belief or understanding of a particular issue or doctrine: People who interpret the Bible this way are usually not willing to let the Bible speak for itself and let the chips fall where they may. They start off with the up-front goal of trying to prove a point they already believe in, and everything they read and interpret is filtered through that paradigm. Stated another way, they engage in what the Bible refers to as "private interpretation". 
Exegesis is the process of approaching Bible interpretation with a humble spirit, and an open mind: In order to gain a true understanding of God's Word, one must be willing to allow God's Word to speak for itself, and be willing to abandon cherished beliefs if they are in conflict with God's Word: Proper exegesis includes using the context around the passage, comparing it with other parts of the Bible, and applying an understanding of the language and customs of the time of the writing, in an attempt to understand clearly what the original writer intended to convey. In other words, it is trying to "pull out" of the passage the meaning inherent in it. The opposite of exegesis is eisegesis, which is a person's particular interpretation of scriptures that are not evident in the text itself.

1Timothy 4:1  is one of many verses misunderstood in the Bible, those who believe that true believers can lose their salvation attempt to use this verse to argue that a true Spirit born-again believer [ after being saved by God's grace ] can lose their salvation. In this lesson I do a [critical explanation of the text of Scripture] to pull out the true meaning of 1Timothy 4:1 in light of its context and its association  with other Bible verses that can be easily connected to it.
______________________________________________________________
Eisegesis is the approach to Bible interpretation where the interpreter tries to "force" the Bible to mean something that fits their existing belief or understanding of a particular issue or doctrine:  People who interpret the Bible this way are usually not willing to let the Bible speak for itself and let the chips fall where they may.  They start off with the up-front goal of trying to prove a point they already believe in, and everything they rea

"1Timothy 4:1 explained" - (Exegesis Vs. Eisegesis)

Second Peter 2:20-22 is one of many passages misunderstood in the Bible, those who believe that true believers can lose their salvation attempt to use this passage to argue that a true Spirit born-again believer [ after being saved by God's grace ] can lose their salvation. In this lesson I do a [critical explanation of the text of Scripture] to pull out the true meaning of Second Peter 2:20-22 in light of its context and its association with other Bible verses that can be easily connected to it. 
______________________________________________________________ 
Eisegesis is the approach to Bible interpretation where the interpreter tries to "force" the Bible to mean something that fits their existing belief or understanding of a particular issue or doctrine: People who interpret the Bible this way are usually not willing to let the Bible speak for itself and let the chips fall where they may. They start off with the up-front goal of trying to prove a point they already believe in, and everything they read and interpret is filtered through that paradigm. Stated another way, they engage in what the Bible refers to as "private interpretation". 
Exegesis is the process of approaching Bible interpretation with a humble spirit, and an open mind: In order to gain a true understanding of God's Word, one must be willing to allow God's Word to speak for itself, and be willing to abandon cherished beliefs if they are in conflict with God's Word: Proper exegesis includes using the context around the passage, comparing it with other parts of the Bible, and applying an understanding of the language and customs of the time of the writing, in an attempt to understand clearly what the original writer intended to convey. In other words, it is trying to "pull out" of the passage the meaning inherent in it. The opposite of exegesis is eisegesis, which is a person's particular interpretation of scriptures that are not evident in the text itself.

Second Peter 2:20-22 is one of many passages misunderstood in the Bible, those who believe that true believers can lose their salvation attempt to use this passage to argue that a true Spirit born-again believer [ after being saved by God's grace ] can lose their salvation. In this lesson I do a [critical explanation of the text of Scripture] to pull out the true meaning of Second Peter 2:20-22 in light of its context and its association  with other Bible verses that can be easily connected to it.
______________________________________________________________
Eisegesis is the approach to Bible interpretation where the interpreter tries to "force" the Bible to mean something that fits their existing belief or understanding of a particular issue or doctrine:  People who interpret the Bible this way are usually not willing to let the Bible speak for itself and let the chips fall where they may.  They start off with the up-front goal of trying to prove a point they already believe in, and 

"2Peter 2:20-22 explained" - (Exegesis Vs. Eisegesis)

John 15:6 is one of many verses misunderstood in the Bible, those who believe that true believers can lose their salvation attempt to use this verse to argue that a true Spirit born-again believer [ after being saved by God's grace ] can lose their salvation. In this lesson I do a [critical explanation of the text of Scripture] to pull out the true meaning of John 15:6 in light of its context and its association with other Bible verses that can be easily connected to it. 
___________________________ 
Eisegesis is the approach to Bible interpretation where the interpreter tries to "force" the Bible to mean something that fits their existing belief or understanding of a particular issue or doctrine: People who interpret the Bible this way are usually not willing to let the Bible speak for itself and let the chips fall where they may. They start off with the up-front goal of trying to prove a point they already believe in, and everything they read and interpret is filtered through that paradigm. Stated another way, they engage in what the Bible refers to as "private interpretation". 
Exegesis is the process of approaching Bible interpretation with a humble spirit, and an open mind: In order to gain a true understanding of God's Word, one must be willing to allow God's Word to speak for itself, and be willing to abandon cherished beliefs if they are in conflict with God's Word: Proper exegesis includes using the context around the passage, comparing it with other parts of the Bible, and applying an understanding of the language and customs of the time of the writing, in an attempt to understand clearly what the original writer intended to convey. In other words, it is trying to "pull out" of the passage the meaning inherent in it. The opposite of exegesis is eisegesis, which is a person's particular interpretation of scriptures that are not evident in the text itself.

John 15:6 is one of many verses misunderstood in the Bible, those who believe that true believers can lose their salvation attempt to use this verse to argue that a true Spirit born-again believer [ after being saved by God's grace ] can lose their salvation. In this lesson I do a [critical explanation of the text of Scripture] to pull out the true meaning of John 15:6 in light of its context and its association  with other Bible verses that can be easily connected to it.
___________________________
Eisegesis is the approach to Bible interpretation where the interpreter tries to "force" the Bible to mean something that fits their existing belief or understanding of a particular issue or doctrine:  People who interpret the Bible this way are usually not willing to let the Bible speak for itself and let the chips fall where they may.  They start off with the up-front goal of trying to prove a point they already believe in, and everything they read and interpret is filtered through that p

"John 15:6 explained" - (Exegesis Vs. Eisegesis)

Does the Bible / God prohibit women from being a pastors? 
1 Timothy 2:11-13 is a often cited passage to discredit women preachers. In this lesson I do a [critical interpretation of the text of Scripture] to pull out the true meaning of 1 Timothy 2:11-13 in light of its context.

Does the Bible / God prohibit women from being a pastors?
1 Timothy 2:11-13 is a often cited passage to discredit women preachers. In this lesson I do a [critical interpretation of the text of Scripture] to pull out the true meaning of 1 Timothy 2:11-13 in light of its context.

"Women Pastors?" (1Timothy 2:11-13 explained)

Does the Bible / God prohibit women from preaching? 
1 Corinthians 14:34-35 is a often cited passage given to discredit women preachers. In this lesson I do a [critical interpretation of the text of Scripture] to pull out the true meaning of 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 in light of its context.

Does the Bible / God prohibit women from preaching?
1 Corinthians 14:34-35 is a often cited passage given to discredit women preachers. In this lesson I do a [critical interpretation of the text of Scripture] to pull out the true meaning of 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 in light of its context.

Samuel Patterson Videos

"Ezekiel 33:13" - Explained, (Short version)

'GOD IS NOT A MAN' | Numbers 23:19 & Hosea 11:9, Explained.'

"Who is the Restrainer?" ( 2 Thessalonians 2:6-9 )

"Matthew 7:21-22 explained" - (Exegesis Vs. Eisegesis)

"Can true believers be blotted out of the book of Life?" ( Rev 3:5 )

"1Timothy 4:1 explained" - (Exegesis Vs. Eisegesis)

"2Peter 2:20-22 explained" - (Exegesis Vs. Eisegesis)

"John 15:6 explained" - (Exegesis Vs. Eisegesis)

"Women Pastors?" (1Timothy 2:11-13 explained)

"Women Preachers?" (1Cor 14:34-35 explained)

"Ezekiel 33:13 explained" - (Exegesis Vs. Eisegesis)

Description

Group of Brands

Samuel Patterson Videos

Sort by Default

Description

Group of Brands